Home arrow Issues arrow To Pray or Not to Pray
Signup for the Freedoms' Alert newspaper and Weekly E-Alerts by e-mail.
 Donate
NYCF
NYCFPAC
  
Facebook
  
Twitter

Latest Events

Sun, Sep 5th, @9:30am - 12:00PM
Tom Speaking @ First Baptist Church of Elba, NY
Sun, Sep 12th, @9:30am - 12:00PM
Jason Speaking @ First Baptist Church (Three Mile Bay)
Sun, Sep 12th, @9:30am - 12:00PM
Tom Speaking a Latham Bible Baptist Church
Sun, Sep 12th, @5:00pm - 07:00PM
Jason Speaking @ Theresa Presbyterian Church (Theresa)
Tue, Sep 14th, @12:00pm - 09:00PM
Primary Day
Thu, Sep 16th
Jason Speaking @ Family Research Council HQ (Washington, DC)
To Pray or Not to Pray PDF Print E-mail

Students do not give up their first amendment rights at graduation.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."  – First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Although there is some confusion, the U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled against student led prayer, including at graduation ceremonies. In 1962, the Court ruled in Engel v. Vitale against a government mandated prayer. Specifically, the New York Board of Regents was challenged for ordering children to begin the day in public school by praying this simple prayer:


"Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and beg Thy blessings upon us, our teachers, and our Country."

Image

The Court ruled that this was a violation of the First Amendment’s second clause, "respecting the establishment of religion." The Court ruled that, because this amendment (and the rest of the Bill of Rights) was made applicable by the Fourteenth Amendment, state officials may not compose an official state prayer and require that it be recited in the public schools at the beginning of each day—even if the prayer is denominationally neutral and pupils who wish to do so may remain silent or be excused from the room while the prayer is being recited.

Since then, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the First Amendment requires public school officials to be neutral in their treatment of religion, showing neither favoritism toward, nor hostility against religious expression such as prayer. (Good News Club v. Milford Cent. School, 533 U.S. 98); Everson v. Board of Education., 330 U.S. 1). Accordingly, the Court ruled that the First Amendment forbids religious activity that is sponsored by the government, but protects religious activity that is initiated by private individuals, and the line between government-sponsored and privately initiated religious expression is vital to a proper understanding of the First Amendment’s scope.

As the Court has explained in several cases, "there is a crucial difference between government speech endorsing religion, which the Establishment Clause forbids, and private speech endorsing religion, which the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses protect" (Santa Fe Independent School District. v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290, 302 (2000)).

The Court recognizes that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate" (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. 393 U.S. 503, 506).

In addition, the Supreme Court has made clear that "private religious speech, far from being a First Amendment orphan, is as fully protected under the Free Speech Clause as secular private expression." (Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board. v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753, 760).
Moreover, not all religious speech that takes place in the public schools or at school-sponsored events is governmental speech. (Santa Fe, 530 U.S. at 302). For example, "nothing in the Constitution ... prohibits any public school student from voluntarily praying at any time before, during, or after the school day," and students may pray with fellow students during the school day on the same terms and conditions that they may engage in other conversation or speech. (Santa Fe, 530 U.S. at 313).

What Is Prohibited?

Liberty Council’s Legal Memo on Graduation Prayer notes: "The Court’s decision in Lee v. Weisman has caused some confusion as to whether prayers are permissible at graduation. To understand what is prohibited by the United States Supreme Court decision in Lee v. Weisman, it is important to know some of the history regarding the case. The Supreme Court’s decision focused on the following three factors: (1) the school principal decided that an invocation and benediction would be given at the ceremony and placed prayer on the agenda; (2) the principal chose the religious participant; and (3) the principal provided the clergyman with a copy of Guidelines for Civic Occasions, produced by the National Council of Christians and Jews, outlining suggestions for delivering nonsectarian prayers. The Court found that these three factors placed the school in the position of guiding and directing the content of the prayer during a public ceremony.

"What the Supreme Court prohibited can be summarized as follows: School officials cannot direct that prayer be part of a public school graduation ceremony, select a religious participant for the express purpose of delivering a prayer, and give guidelines on how to say a nonsectarian, non-proselytizing prayer. In practical terms, a public school cannot invite a clergyman to say a prayer at a graduation ceremony and direct the content or manner of the prayer. As an additional note, the Lee decision does not affect graduation prayers at post-secondary schools, that is, the college or university."

Liberty Council sites three ways prayer can be included in graduation ceremonies "(1) Student messages (where a student rather than an adult is selected to pray at the service); (2) Student selected by religious-neutral criteria (such as a Valedictorian, Salutatorian, Class President, or other student includes prayer as a part of his message; (3) An outside speaker selected by religion-neutral criteria (the speaker chooses to include prayer in his message); and (4) A privately held graduation (sponsored by groups other than the school, such as churches in the community)". Any one of these options would allow prayer to be given at graduation.

Christian students need to stand up for their right to pray at graduation. In order to help them do so, Liberty Council has launched its annual "Friend or Foe" Graduation Prayer Campaign seeking to educate and, if necessary, litigate to ensure that prayer and religious viewpoints are not suppressed during public graduation ceremonies. Liberty Council will be the "friend" of school districts that recognize the free speech rights of students and invited speakers and the "foe" of those that violate their constitutional rights.

Last Updated ( Saturday, 30 May 2009 )